Dry Stacked Block Certification Standards
Dry stacked block home construction is a fully certified building standard. This building medium has been around for decades but never became popular. Today's world has many reasons to consider dry-stacked home construction as an economic alternative building medium. Especially when you consider Thermal Mass Home (TMH) design energy savings. I believe this building medium never became popular just because there was never any all inclusive documentation such as this website and this book and DVD. I did not just assume that this was a good construction medium. Instead, I sought out factual certification based upon engineering standards before I commenced my project. These home construction engineering standards are contained within three primary document standards as listed below:
Standard Practice for Construction of Dry-Stacked, Surface-Bonded Walls - This engineering standard is also known as "ASTM C-946-91 (reapproved 2001)" (change -91 with any future revision year). This standard is copyrighted so I can't publish quotes directly from this standard. The standard can be purchased at aec.ihs.com for about $30.00.
The following is their description of the standard:
The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for information only.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
following is my list of their standard topics:
Surface Bonding Product Data Sheet - This engineering data sheet can be obtained directly from the manufacturer. You can search for alternate SBC manufacturers on the Internet using the search phrase "surface bonding cement". The Quikwall product that I used is manufactured by Quikrete, who's website is www.quikrete.com.The data sheet for Quikwall can be found at SPEC_DATA-QUIKWALL.pdf. There is also a material safety data sheet located at MSDS-E2-PlastersAndCoatings.pdf. These data sheets provide the physical and structural engineering properties for the SBC and block walls bonded with this SBC.
Local Building Code - Example excerpts of local building code in the Florida building code are listed below:
Building Code, Chapter 21 Masonry, Section 2105 Lateral Stability:
2105.4 Construction. Construction of dry-stacked, surface-bonded masonry walls, including stacking and leveling of units, mixing and application of mortar, curing and protection, shall comply with ASTM C-946.
Throughout the building code, all references to concrete block also include dry-stacked blocks.
For SBC coated dry stacked block walls, Southwest Research Labs in San Antonio, TX; are reported to have certification that this wall has a fire rating of 4-hours. You can find in the Underwriter Laboratories UL-263 Standard that plain mortared block walls have a fire rating of 3-hours if the sheetrock is spaced at least 1/2" away from block wall contact, what ever that means. I just include these references if you are looking for fire-wall ratings sources.
Summary - It is interesting to note the following Quikwall
data sheet specifications for SBC coated walls without rebar
reinforcement versus S-type mortared walls:
World Wall Strength Proven by Accident
When I got out to check the damage, I had to look real hard to find a slight scuff on the wall, which had a little tailgate rust residue embedded into the scuff. Much to my surprise, the wall was not cracked nor was it damaged in any way. Without the rust residue, I never would have found this slight blemish. The corner of the pickup tailgate was bent and badly damaged.
I have seen forums on the Internet where people with no dry-stack experience, bad mouth dry-stacked blocks as being weak. They argue that a block can be easily cracked when there is no mortar to distribute the stress. That statement is true, but has nothing to do with surface bonded blocks. In fact, one of the weaknesses of conventional mortar blocks is that the mortar itself is much weaker than the concrete block. Surface-bonding evenly distributes stress across the entire inside and outside surface of each block, which is 3.5 times larger in surface area (256 square inches) than just the narrow mortared bottom and end area of each conventional mortared block (about 72 square inches). And remember, these 256 square inches are not just weak mortar, but fiber reinforced concrete mix.
It is also interesting to note that the above false complaint about unmortared blocks cracking under stress, actually contributes to stronger SBC bonded walls. When you mortar a block wall or pour a concrete wall, this added wall weight on the concrete foundation adds new stress to the foundation. Since the mortared wall or poured concrete wall sets up over night, any foundation miniscule settling days later will result in additional wall stress. This equates to future wall cracks at mortar joints.
With dry-stacked block walls, this wall weight can rest upon the foundation for weeks before being surface bonded. This allows any miniscule foundation settling from the wall weight to take place unimpeded. When you later apply the SBC to lock all the blocks into one integral unit, those wall stresses will have had time to settle out and the SBC coated wall will have no internal stress from foundation loading.